Three quarters of the way into the novel, I finally
came to the realization that this was not a murder mystery, but a narrative-disguised-as-novel
about how a lawyer defends his client. The
title just as easily might have been Anatomy of a Murder Trial.
No stone is left unturned. We read how a defense attorney gets into the
head of his client, how he constructs and tests his line of argument, how he
might pour over old law journals or burn the midnight oil in mock cross-examinations
with a buddy, how he plays the jury, the judge and the opposing attorney. The
trial is recounted in detail right down to and including the dialogue for the swearing-in of each witness.
Our main character is former District Attorney Paul
Biegler now sole practicing attorney of his own firm. For reasons I never
figured out he goes by the nickname of Polly.
Polly is a man’s man, a bachelor who loves to fish, smoke, have a drink
and practice law. He likes women, but
romance in the book is a sideline.
The language and characters are a little dated but
that made the reading more fun I thought.
For example, the psychiatrist for
the defense sports a crew cut. The local townspeople bring “bag lunches” to the
courtroom. Maida the secretary is just that, a secretary to whom Polly
occasionally delivers a put-down or a tap on the butt. She, in turn, says things like “Not on your
life, Boss” or “You’ll do it, Boss.”
Sprinkled about are references to an “innocent
choirboy,” “two altar boys in the wake
of a priest” and feeling “virtuous, like a boy scout.” Then again, Polly admits to telling a “big
whopper.” Later, it’s a boxing metaphor as Polly recounts how the prosecuting
attorney “looked at me keenly, like a smart boxer stung in the first
round….” Not to be outdone, our Polly returns
fire and says, “…I saw that I had scored with a sneak right.”
Robert Traver, a pseudonym for John D. Voelker was
himself a State Supreme Court Justice in Michigan. He looks vaguely like John Wayne in some of
his photos. Voelker as Traver gives the reader plenty to think about. He includes a bit of philosophizing about
life’s big issues, he paints a vivid picture of the natural beauty of the Upper
Peninsula as well as of rural, small-town culture and he does a good job portraying
the male characters. However, I found
his depictions of women to be little more than shallow caricatures. Except for that, and the mini-romance which I
found rather unimaginatively woven in, everything else about the book made it a
good read.
No comments:
Post a Comment