Nineteen cardinals who might be pope are profiled in this lengthy book which is a thoroughly researched study including
copious footnotes and pleasant, full-page color photos of each candidate. These “leading candidates” as the subtitle
refers to them represent four continents.
There are three from Africa (Cardinals Napier, Sarah
and Turkson), two from Asia (Cardinals Ranjith and Tagle), three from North America
(Cardinals Burke, O’Malley and Ouellet) and the remaining 11 are from Europe
with just over half that representation belonging to the Italians (Cardinals
Bagnasco, Parolin, Piacenza, Ravasi, Scola and Zuppi). The other European countries represented are
the Czech Republic (Cardinal Duka), the Netherlands (Cardinal Eijk), Germany(Cardinal
Muller), Erdo (Hungary) and Austria
(Cardinal Schonbrun).
This book offers insight into the minds of men who have devoted themselves to the Church
and who operate at high levels within an ossified and unwieldy bureaucracy (if
that’s not redundant). They range from noble-born
to the son of a communist truck driver.
They might be a scholarly heavyweight or an intellectual lightweight. They may preside over dancing at the altar or
they may express concern over any variation in the liturgy. They may behave with modest decorum as
regards their public position while others clearly enjoy the spotlight. Some of the few common points among them are age---the
youngest is approaching 70 and the oldest is 82--a belief in the real presence
and the grave evil of abortion.
So thoroughly did I become drawn in to the
other-worldly world of these cardinals that I was compelled to put other
reading aside until I had finished Mr. Pentin’s book. What I had anticipated would be a dry,
encyclopedic kind of coverage was anything but.
Edward Pentin allowed the cardinals to speak for themselves and he
arranged the material by topics making it easy to jump in at any point or to
easily access information about each cardinal.
I highly recommend this book.
************************************************
What follows are some of
my observations based on mere speculation and first impressions, perhaps frivolous. I also made my own list of cardinal
favorites.
Cardinal Tagle from the Philippines comes in dead last
as a promising future pope. He is dubbed the “Asian Francis” and appears to have
not much in his head in the way of brains.
As disastrous as Tagle, would be Ravasi, Zuppi, Schonbrun or Parolin.
Ravasi is the cardinal who arranged the Vatican costumes for the Metropolitan
Museum of Art in New York back in 2018.
Zuppi finds his inspiration in the Sant’Egidio community. Parolin is the Vatican Secretary of State,
politician par excellence, very involved in the current China
policy of the Vatican. Cardinal
Schonbrun is some version of a soft, accommodate-the-culture Catholic on most
issues. Cardinals Turkson and Napier
were surprisingly undynamic.
As for our North American cardinals, I fear none are
destined for the Chair of Peter simply because they don’t speak enough
languages! Cardinal O’Malley might be
described as fluent in Spanish and naturally Cardinal Ouellet would speak
French. But none of our three North Americans is mentioned as having Italian
among their languages or fluency in anything other than their native
tongue. Meanwhile, their brother
cardinals across the pond are described as fluent in anywhere from 5 to 10
languages. Cardinal Ranjith is said to command English, Hebrew, Sinhalese and everything in between, a total of 11
languages!
Also, by virtue of our history, our North American
cardinals do not deal with the range of problems that the other cardinals
face---the legacies of communism and colonialism, proximity of Muslim
countries, poverty and health epidemics such as AIDS or malaria, polygamy, the
consequences of underdevelopment such as lack of transportation, potable water
and so on. Here in North America, we are confronted with neither
the atheism of the Czech Republic nor (sterile, secular Canada and even the USA
aside for a moment) the depth of secularism in the Netherlands where less than
5% of self-proclaimed Catholics attend mass. We increasingly feel our religious
freedoms threatened, but we are not, as in Sri Lanka, a Catholic minority in a
predominantly Buddhist culture.
Most unusual were the impressions I took away of German
Cardinal Muller and the American Cardinal Burke. Both cardinals, highly moral and exceedingly
competent men, are frequently interviewed on EWTN when the more traditional
Catholic perspective is wanted. They sound
forth eloquently on many issues about which it’s obvious that they’ve thought
deeply. When Cardinal Burke speaks one can almost feel the intellect and faith at work. Yet, given the international
character of the papacy, Cardinal Burke seems so solidly American and
Midwestern that he is more logically suited to remaining on our national stage.
Cardinal Muller is a man who appears to exist almost
in the ether. His reasoned thinking and moderated tone, along with a mind that
seems uncompromisingly bent on precision of thought and expression are traits
present to such an extent that it’s difficult to see the Cardinal engaged in everyday
problem solving or meet-the-press-moments that must be required of a political
figure such as the Vicar of Rome.
Here then is my
lineup. Edward Pentin writes that
Cardinal Scola was the “bookies’ favorite at the 2013 conclave” …but “not
enough Italian cardinals could unite around him.” In no particular order, my
lineup also includes Cardinal Scola as well as Italian Cardinals Piacenza and
Bagnasco, Dutch Cardinal Eijk, Hungarian Cardinal Erdo, African Cardinal Sarah, and Asian Cardinal
Ranjith. These cardinals impressed me as
men capable of governing the bureaucratic Church as more than mere administrators or politicians by bringing their depth of mind and character to
the office.